Dendritic cell deficiencies persist seven months after SARS-CoV-2 infection

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-2 infection induces an exacerbated inflammation driven by innate immunity components. Dendritic cells (DCs) play a key role in the defense against viral infections, for instance plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs), have the capacity to produce vast amounts of interferon-alpha (IFN-α). In COVID-19 there is a deficit in DC numbers and IFN-α production, which has been associated with disease severity. In this work, we described that in addition to the DC deficiency, several DC activation and homing markers were altered in acute COVID-19 patients, which were associated with multiple inflammatory markers. Remarkably, previously hospitalized and nonhospitalized patients remained with decreased numbers of CD1c+ myeloid DCs and pDCs seven months after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Moreover, the expression of DC markers such as CD86 and CD4 were only restored in previously nonhospitalized patients, while no restoration of integrin β7 and indoleamine 2,3-dyoxigenase (IDO) levels were observed. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the immunological sequelae of COVID-19

Viral Kinetics in Semen With Different Antiretroviral Families in Treatment-Naive Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients: A Randomized Trial

Background. There are several regimens for starting antiretroviral treatment, but it remains unknown whether either of them is more advantageous regarding the time course and magnitude of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA decay in semen.Objective. To evaluate the differential effect of different antiretroviral drug families on viral kinetics in seminal plasma (SP) of treatment-naive HIV-infected patients.Methods. Phase II, randomized, open-label study in which participants were randomized 1: 1: 1 to receive tenofovir-disoproxil fumarate (DF) plus emtricitabine, and either cobicistat-boosted elvitegravir (EVG(cobi)), rilpivirine (RPV), or ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRVrtv). The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with undetectable HIV-RNA in SP at week 12. HIV type 1 (HIV-1) RNA was measured in paired SP and blood plasma (BP) at baseline and after 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 weeks. Elvitegravir (EVG), RPV, and darunavir (DRV) concentrations were quantified by the liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method.Results. In SP, the HIV-RNA decay rate with RPV was as fast as with EVG(cobi); by week 12, all participants in the RPV and the EVG(cobi) groups reached an undetectable viral load but only 58.3% in the DRVrtv arm (P = .003). The highest SP/BP drug concentration ratio was for EVG (0.43), followed-up by RPV (0.19), and DRV (0.10). For both EVG and RPV, the SP concentrations exceeded >2-fold the protein binding-adjusted EC90 for wild-type HIV-1; for DRV, only 33.7% of the SP showed concentrations above the protein binding-adjusted EC90.Conclusions. In SP, both RPV and EVG(cobi), associated to tenofovir-DF and emtricitabine, behave similarly and achieve an undetectable viral load much faster than DRVrtv

Mesenchymal stromal cells in human immunodeficiency virus‐infected patients with discordant immune response: Early results of a phase I/II clinical trial

Between 15% and 30% of HIV‐infected subjects fail to increase their CD4+ T‐cell counts despite continuous viral suppression (immunological nonresponders [INRs]). These subjects have a higher morbidity and mortality rate, but there are no effective treatments to reverse this situation so far. This study used data from an interrupted phase I/II clinical trial to evaluate safety and immune recovery after INRs were given four infusions, at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, and 20, with human allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells from adipose tissue (Ad‐MSCs). Based on the study design, the first 5 out of 15 INRs recruited received unblinded Ad‐MSC infusions. They had a median CD4+ nadir count of 16/μL (range, 2‐180) and CD4+ count of 253 cells per microliter (171‐412) at baseline after 109 (54‐237) months on antiretroviral treatment and 69 (52‐91) months of continuous undetectable plasma HIV‐RNA. After a year of follow‐up, an independent committee recommended the suspension of the study because no increase of CD4+ T‐cell counts or CD4+/CD8+ ratios was observed. There were also no significant changes in the phenotype of different immunological lymphocyte subsets, percentages of natural killer cells, regulatory T cells, and dendritic cells, the inflammatory parameters analyzed, and cellular associated HIV‐DNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Furthermore, three subjects suffered venous thrombosis events directly related to the Ad‐MSC infusions in the arms where the infusions were performed. Although the current study is based on a small sample of participants, the findings suggest that allogeneic Ad‐MSC infusions are not effective to improve immune recovery in INR patients or to reduce immune activation or inflammation. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT0229004. EudraCT number: 2014‐000307‐26.Andalusian Network for the Design and Translation of Advanced Therapies; Andalusian Regional Ministry of Health and Families, Grant/Award Number: 201600073585‐tra; Red de Investigación en SIDA, Grant/Award Number: RD16/0025/0020‐ISCIII‐FEDER; Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Grant/Award Number: PI15/01041